Preliminary Data of Neck Muscle Morphology With Head-Supported Mass in Male and Female Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: This study quantified parameters related to muscle morphology using a group of upright seated female and male volunteers with a head-supported mass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upright magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were obtained from 23 healthy volunteers after approval from the U.S. DoD. They were asymptomatic for neck pain, with no history of injury. The volunteers were scanned using an upright MRI scanner with a head-supported mass (army combat helmet). T1 and T2 sagittal and axial images were obtained. Measurements were performed by an engineer and a neurosurgeon. The cross-sectional areas of the sternocleidomastoid and multifidus muscles were measured at the inferior endplate in the sub-axial column, and the centroid angle and centroid radius were quantified. Differences in the morphology by gender and spinal level were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of variance model, adjusted for multiple corrections. RESULTS: For females and males, the cross-sectional area of the sternocleidomastoid muscle ranged from 2.3 to 3.6 cm2 and from 3.4 to 5.4 cm2, the centroid radius ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 cm and from 4.7 to 5.7 cm, and the centroid angle ranged from 75° to 131° and from 4.8° to 131.2°, respectively. For the multifidus muscle, the area ranged from 1.7 to 3.9 cm2 and from 2.4 to 4.2 cm2, the radius ranged from 3.1 to 3.4 cm and from 3.3 to 3.8 cm, the angle ranged from 15° to 24.4° and 16.2° to 24.4°, respectively. Results from all levels for both muscles and male and female spines are given. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-sectional area, angulation, and centroid radii data for flexor and extensor muscles of the cervical spine serve as a dataset that may be used to better define morphologies in computational models and obtain segmental motions and loads under external mechanical forces. These data can be used in computational models for injury prevention, mitigation, and readiness.

Upper cervical spine bone mineral content variations in elderly females.

The purpose of the study was to determine the bone mineral densities (BMDs) of the C1 and C2 vertebrae and discuss their implications for autonomous vehicle environments and vulnerable road users. Using quantitated computed tomography (QCT), the BMDs were obtained at eight regions for the C1 vertebra and seven regions for the C2 vertebra. The spine surgeon author outlined the boundaries of each region, and nine elderly female human cadaver specimens were used. The regions were based on potential stabilization locations for fracture fixation. In the C1 vertebra, the BMD was greatest at the anterior tubercle, followed by the posterior tubercle, the posterior arch, and the lateral and anterior lateral masses. In the C2 vertebra, the distal odontoid had the greatest BMD, followed by the spinous process, the C2-lateral mass, the odontoid-body interface, and the anterior inferior aspect of the body. Use of these data in female-specific finite element models may lead to a better understanding of load paths, injuries, mechanisms, and tolerance.

Regional variations in C1-C2 bone density on quantitated computed tomography and clinical implications.

Background: Our elderly population is growing and the number of spine fractures in the elderly is also growing. The elderly population in general may be considered as poor surgical candidates experience a high rate of fractures at C1 and C2 compared with the general population. Nonoperative management of upper cervical fractures is not benign as there is a high nonunion rate for both C1 and C2 fractures in the elderly, and orthosis compliance is often suboptimal, or complicated by skin breakdown. The optimal technique for upper cervical stabilization in the elderly may be different than in younger populations as the bone quality is inferior in the elderly. The objective of this basic science study is to determine whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of C1 and C2 vary by region, and if this is a gender difference in this elderly age group. Methods: Twenty cadaveric spines from 45 to 83 years of age were used to obtain BMD using quantitated computed tomography (QCT). BMD was measured using a QCT. For C1, 8 regions were determined: anterior tubercle, bilateral anterior and medial lateral masses, bilateral posterior arches, and posterior tubercle. For C2, 7 regional BMDs were determined: top of odontoid, base of odontoid-body interface, mid body, bilateral lateral masses, anterior inferior body near the discs space, and the C2 spinous process. Results: The BMD was greatest at the C1 anterior tubercle (564.4±175.8 mg/cm3) and C1 posterior ring (420.8±110.2 mg/cm3), and least at the anterior and medial lateral masses (262.8±59.5 mg/cm3, 316.9±72.6 mg/cm3). At C2 QCT BMD was greatest at the top of the dens (400.6±107.9 mg/cm3) decreasing down through the odontoid-C2 body junction (267.8±103.5 mg/cm3) and least in the mid C2 body 249.1±68.8 mg/cm3). The posterior arch of C1 and the spinous process of C2 had higher BMD's 420.8±110.2 mg/cm3 and 284.1±93.0 mg/cm3, respectively. A high correlation was observed between the BMD at the interface of the dens-vertebral body with the vertebral body with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. The BMD of the top of dens was significantly higher (p<.05) than all the regions in C2. Conclusions: Regional and segmental BMD variations at C1 and C2 have clinical implications for surgical constructs in the elderly population. Given the higher BMDs of the C1 and C2 spinous process and posterior arches, consideration should be given to incorporate these areas using various C1-C2 wiring techniques. In the elderly, lateral masses particularly at C1 with lower BMD may result in potential screw loosening and nonunion in this age group. Old-school wiring techniques have a track record of efficacy and safety with less blood loss, reduced operative time, reduced X-ray exposure, and should be considered in the elderly as a primary stabilization technique or a belt-over suspenders approach based on regional variations in BMD in the elderly.

Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic capacity and sports-specific skills in basketball players.

INTRODUCTION: High intensity interval training (HIIT) are widely used to improve the cardiac performance in Basketball players. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training on the Aerobic Capacity and sports-specific skills in basketball players. METHODS: 40 male basketball players in the age group 18-25 years were recruited after necessary ethical clearance. Athletes were categorized into two groups of 20 people each: Group 1 control group (age: 21.9 ± 2.4 years, height: 184.6 ± 12.1 cm BMI: 23 ± 3 kg/m2) and Group 2 study group with HIIT (age: 21.4 ± 2.6 years, height: 177.4 ± 6.0 cm BMI: 22.1 ± 2.3 kg/m2). The study group players underwent 5 weeks (10 sessions) of HIIT training. Pre and post intervention evaluation of the Aerobic Capacity (VO2 max) and sports-specific skills were quantified for both the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using one tailed t-test with p < 0.05 for significance. Cohen's D method was used to calculate the effect size and minimum important difference. RESULT: There was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in VO2 max (pre:52.8 ± 2.3 ml/min/kg to post: 54.5 ± 2.4 ml/min/kg) in Group 2 whereas in Group 1 the change was not significant (pre:51.1 ± 2.6 ml/min/kg to post: 51.4 ± 2.9 ml/min/kg). Similarly, there was an increase in agility for Group 2 (pre:11.0 ± 1.0 s to post: 10.1 ± 1.0 s) compared to Group 1. In sports specific skills: Control Dribble, passing skills, Lower body power and shooting skills there was a significant increase in post HIIT training for Group 2, whereas in Group 1 there was no significant difference. DISCUSSION: The HIIT training improved the aerobic capacity (VO2 max) and sports-specific skills in basketball players. CONCLUSION: A 5-week HIIT training improved the aerobic capacity and sports specific skills and may be included as a part of training regime to improve the athletic performance in basketball players.

Morphometry of lumbar muscles in the seated posture with weight-bearing MR scans.

Conventional imaging studies of human spine are done in a supine posture in which the axial loading of the spine is not considered. Upright images better reveal the interrelationships between the various internal structures of the spine. The objective of the current study is to determine the cross-sectional areas, radii, and angulations of the psoas, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles of the lumbar spine in the sitting posture. Ten young (mean age 31 ± 4.8 years) asymptomatic female subjects were enrolled. They were seated in an erect posture and weight-bearing T1 and T2 MRIs were obtained. Cross-sectional areas, radii, and angulations of the muscles were measured from L1-L5. Two observers repeated all the measurements for all parameters, and reliability was determined using the inter- and intra-class coefficients. The Pearson product moment correlation was used for association between levels, while level differences were used using a linear regression model. The cross-sectional areas of the psoas and multifidus muscles increased from L1 to L5 (1.9 ± 1.1 to 12.1 ± 2.5 cm2 and 1.8 ± 0.3 to 5.7 ± 1.4 cm2). The cross-sectional area of the erector spinae was greatest at the midlevel (13.9 ± 2.2 cm2) and it decreased in both directions. For the angle, the range for psoas muscles was 75-105°, erector spinae were 39-46° and multifidus was 11-19°. Correlations magnitudes were inconsistent between levels and muscle types. These quantitated data improve our understanding of the geometrical properties in the sitting posture. The weight-bearing MRI-quantified morphometrics of human lumbar spine muscles from this study can be used in biomechanical models for predicting loads on spinal joints under physiological and traumatic situations.

Mechanisms of cervical spine injury and coupling response with initial head rotated posture - implications for AIS coding.

Objective: This objective of the present study is to describe the responses of the human head-cervical spine in terms of injuries, injury mechanisms, injury scoring, and quantify multiplanar loads.Methods: Pretest radiographs of pre-screened five human cadaver head-neck complexes were obtained. Cranium contents and sectioned the structure rostral to skull base. The caudal end was embedded, and cervical-thoracic disc was unconstrained condition. The loading was applied as a torque about the occipital condyle joint. The head and T1 were angulated 30 degrees and 25 degrees. Peak forces and moments at the occipital condyles were recorded using a six-axis load cell. After testing, x-rays and CT images were obtained. Injuries were scored using the Abbreviated Injury Scale, AIS 2015 version.Results: The mean age, stature, total body mass, body mass index of the five subjects were as follows: 63 years, 1.7 m, 78.0 kg, and 28.1 kg/m2. The mean peak axial force and coronal, sagittal, and axial bending moments were: 754 N, and 36.8 Nm, 14.8 Nm, and 9.5 Nm. All but one specimen sustained injury. Injuries were scored at the AIS 2 level. Two specimens sustained left anterior inferior lateral mass fractures of the atlas. While the transverse atlantal ligament was intact, some capsular ligament involvement was observed. In the other two specimens, although the same injury was noted, joint diastasis of the atlas-axis joint was identified.Conclusions: Using a PMHS model, the present study described the biomechanics of the initially head rotated head-neck complex under lateral bending in terms of injuries, injury mechanisms, quantification of the multiplanar loads at the occipital condyles, and underscored potential injury scoring issues for occupant protection. The issue of diastasis is not addressed in the AIS 2015 version. While this may not always result in immediate instability and require surgical intervention, it may be necessary to revisit this issue. Upper cervical fractures with diastasis and or transverse atlantal ligament involvement may be potential injury scoring factors for AIS consideration.

Normalization technique to build patient specific muscle model in finite element head neck spine.

Finite element models of the head and neck are widely used in automotive and clinical fields to understand spinal biomechanics. These models are developed based on CT and MRI scans of the subjects, but historically the muscle data are obtained from cadaveric specimen. The cadaver data is often obtained from older specimens which commonly have undergone degenerative changes resulting in reduction in muscle cross section area. The objective of the current study is to compare the muscle cross-section area used by various finite element models of neck muscles used in the literature and to develop a normalization technique to scale the MRI muscle cross-section area with those available in the literature. Four male and seven female healthy asymptomatic young adult volunteers enrolled in the study after obtaining necessary approval from Institutional Review Board. T1 and T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed in neutral upright sitting position wearing military helmet. Muscle cross sectional area was obtained for multifidus muscles from the MRI images. Data was compared with those in the literature. Based on the literature review of prior studies, the cross-sectional area of cadaver specimens was smaller than the MRI obtained muscle area. Multifidus muscle scaling factor was obtained by ratio of sum of MRI cross section area with that of cadaver data. Based on the analysis, the scaling factor for male data is 1.6 and for female data is 1.3. the cadaver data can be multiplied by the scaling factor to obtain the MRI specific cross-sectional area. A Normalization technique was developed for scaling MRI data into finite element model. This technique can be used in developing subject specific finite element model of spine which has applications in clinical, automotive, and military environment.

Biomechanics of core musculature on upper extremity performance in basketball players.

INTRODUCTION: Basketball is a dynamic team sport which involves skilled movement and activities. Shooting is considered to be an essential part of the game for scoring points. The core strength is an important preconditioning for the sport, and it influences the performance of the player. METHOD: In this study the subjects included thirty-six male basketball players divided into two groups of high and low core groups. The subjects performed one arm hop test and modified upper quarter y balance test (mUQYBT) under with and without core activation condition. The performance of the subjects was evaluated using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukeys HSD. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 as significant. Value of confidence interval was set at 95%. RESULTS: Based on the study, significant difference (p < 0.05) in performance for one arm hop test was observed among all the four groups of core muscles (group 1: high core with core activation, group 2 high core without core activation, group 3 low core with core activation and group 4 low core without core activation). Whereas, no significant difference (p > 0.05) in performance for mUQYBT was observed among all four groups. DISCUSSION: Core training is the basis for many functional movements and has become the norm in athletic training programs. Broad benefits of core stabilization have been overlooked, from improving athletic performance to preventing injuries in the sports medicine world. CONCLUSION: In the present study, core activation was associated with improved stability and mobility of basketball players during the upper extremity performance test, and the greatest influence of core activation was seen in individuals with lower core scores.

Upright Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Cervical Flexor/Extensor Musculature and Cervical Lordosis in Females After Helmet Wear.

INTRODUCTION: Addition of head-supported mass imparts greater demand on the human neck to maintain functionality. The same head-supported mass induces greater demand on the female spine than the male spine because female necks are comparatively slender. Prevalence of neck pain is greater in military than civilian population because of the head-borne mass (among other factors). The goal of this study is to determine quantifiable parameters related to muscle geometry using female human volunteers and upright magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Young healthy subjects were consented. Demographics and head-neck anthropometry were recorded. For all the 7 subjects, the T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the neutral sitting position was obtained immediately following donning and after 4 hours of continuous wear of standard issued military helmet, while seated in the same posture for 4 hours. Cross-sectional areas of sternocleidomastoid and multifidus muscles from C2-C7, overall and segmental Cobb angles (C2-T1), and centroid and radius of each muscle were calculated. Data were compared with determine differences with the continuous helmet wear. RESULTS: There were level specific changes in morphological parameters for each of the muscles. Significant difference (P < 0.05) in cross-sectional areas was noted at C2-3 level for sternocleidomastoid and at C3-4 and C5-6 levels for multifidus. For centroid angles, significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed at C2-3 and C5-6 levels for sternocleidomastoid and at C3-4 level for multifidus. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in muscle centroid radii between the pre- and posttest conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in muscle geometries were muscle specific and level specific: sternocleidomastoid was significant at the upper level, whereas multifidus was significant at the mid-lower cervical spine segments. The insignificant difference in the Cobb angles was attributed to length of time of continuous helmet wear attributed and sample size. Helmet wear can lead to morphometric alterations in cervical flexor/extensor musculature in females.

Animal models of spinal injury for studying back pain and SCI.

INTRODUCTION: Back pain is a common ailment affecting individuals around the globe. Animal models to understand the back pain mechanism, treatment modalities, and spinal cord injury are widely researched topics worldwide. Despite the presence of several animal models on disc degeneration and Spinal Cord Injury, there is a lack of a comprehensive review. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A methodological narrative literature review was carried out for the study. A total of 1273 publications were found, out of which 763 were related to spine surgery in animals. The literature with full-text availability was selected for the review. Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines was used to assess the studies. Only English language publications were included which were listed on PubMed. A total of 113 studies were shortlisted (1976-2019) after internal validation scoring. RESULT: The animal models for spine surgery ranged from rodents to primates. These are used to study the mechanisms of back pain as well as spinal cord injuries. The models could either be created surgically or through various means like use of electric cautery, chemicals or trauma. Genetic spine models have also been documented in which the injuries are created by genetic alterations and knock outs. Though the dorsal approach is the most common, the literature also mentions the anterior and lateral approach for spine surgery animal experiments. CONCLUSION: There are no single perfect animal models to represent and study human models. The selection is based on the application and the methodology. Careful selection is needed to give optimum and appropriate results.

Identification of Pedicle Screw Pullout Load Paths for Osteoporotic Vertebrae.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To determine the actual load path and compare pullout strengths as a function of screw size used in revision surgeries using postmortem human subject specimens. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Pedicle screw fixation has become the standard of care in the surgical management of spinal instability. However, pullout failures are widely observed in osteoporotic spines and treated by revision surgeries using a higher diameter screw, performing cement augmentation, or increasing the levels of fixation. While the peak forces to final pullout are reported, the actual load path to achieve the final force level is not available. METHODS: Six osteoporotic lumbar spines (L2-L5) were instrumented with 5.5×40 mm polyaxial screws and loaded along the axis of the screw using a material testing machine according to American Society for Testing of Materials 543-07 test protocol. Tests were again conducted by replacing them with 6.5×40 mm (group A) or 7.5×40 mm (group B) screws. Force-displacement data were grouped and load paths (mean±1 standard deviation) were compared. RESULTS: Pullout strength decreased by 36% when the size of the revision screw was increased by 1 mm, while it increased by 35% when the size of the revision screw was increased by 2 mm compared to the index screw value. While the morphologies of the load paths were similar in all cases, they differ between the two groups: the larger screw responded with generally elevated stiffer path than the smaller screw, suggesting that revision surgery using a larger screw has more purchase along the inserted body-pedicle axis. CONCLUSIONS: A larger screw enhances strength and increases biomechanical stability in revision surgeries, although the final surgical decision is made by the clinician, which includes the patient's anatomy and associated characteristics.

Comparison of pullout strength of pedicle screws following revision using larger diameter screws.

Pedicle screw fixation and fusion are the gold standard for the treatment of spinal instability. Screw failures such as pullout and breakages have been reported during the past several years of research and development in this field. Further, the rate of revision surgeries due to failed pedicle screws is around 2-12%. This creates unavoidable hardship to the patients. Improper screw size for revision surgery can lead to complications such as pedicle fractures, screw pullout, or reduced stability of the fusion construct. We performed pullout strength studies on five osteoporotic lumbar vertebra and a rigid polyurethane foam block to find the effect of the outer diameter of revision screws as per American Standards for Testing of Materials (ASTM) 543-07 protocol. The present study revealed that whereas the use of revision screws that were one millimeter greater in diameter than the original screws decreased the pullout strength by 79% in the foam model, the pullout strength increased by 121% when the original index screws were replaced with screws that were two millimeters greater in diameter. The effect of revision screw diameter on pullout strength was significant (p < 0.05). Cadaveric testing reveals a trend that agrees with the foam model tests.

Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach.

Study Design: A biomechanical study. Purpose: To develop a predictive model for pullout strength. Overview of Literature: Spine fusion surgeries are performed to correct joint deformities by restricting motion between two or more unstable vertebrae. The pedicle screw provides a corrective force to the unstable spinal segment and arrests motions at the unit that are being fused. To determine the hold of a screw, surgeons depend on a subjective perioperative feeling of insertion torque. The objective of the paper was to develop a machine learning based model using density of foam, insertion angle, insertion depth, and reinsertion to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw. Methods: To predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw, an experimental dataset of 48 data points was used as training data to construct a model based on different machine learning algorithms. A total of five algorithms were tested in the Weka environment and the performance was evaluated based on correlation coefficient and error matrix. A sensitive study of various parameters for obtaining the best combination of parameters for predicting the pullout strength was also preformed using the L9 orthogonal array of Taguchi Design of Experiments. Results: Random forest performed the best with a correlation coefficient of 0.96, relative absolute error of 0.28, and root relative squared error of 0.29. The difference between the experimental and predicted value for the six test cases was not significant (p >0.05). Conclusions: This model can be used clinically for understanding the failure of pedicle screw pullout and pre-surgical planning for spine surgeon.

Evaluating Pedicle-Screw Instrumentation Using Decision-Tree Analysis Based on Pullout Strength.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study of pedicle-screw pullout strength. PURPOSE: To develop a decision tree based on pullout strength for evaluating pedicle-screw instrumentation. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Clinically, a surgeon's understanding of the holding power of a pedicle screw is based on perioperative intuition (which is like insertion torque) while inserting the screw. This is a subjective feeling that depends on the skill and experience of the surgeon. With the advent of robotic surgery, there is an urgent need for the creation of a patient-specific surgical planning system. A learning-based predictive model is needed to understand the sensitivity of pedicle-screw holding power to various factors. METHODS: Pullout studies were carried out on rigid polyurethane foam, representing extremely osteoporotic to normal bone for different insertion depths and angles of a pedicle screw. The results of these experimental studies were used to build a pullout-strength predictor and a decision tree using a machine-learning approach. RESULTS: Based on analysis of variance, it was found that all the factors under study had a significant effect (p <0.05) on the holding power of a pedicle screw. Of the various machine-learning techniques, the random forest regression model performed well in predicting the pullout strength and in creating a decision tree. Performance was evaluated, and a correlation coefficient of 0.99 was obtained between the observed and predicted values. The mean and standard deviation of the normalized predicted pullout strength for the confirmation experiment using the current model was 1.01±0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The random forest regression model was used to build a pullout-strength predictor and decision tree. The model was able to predict the holding power of a pedicle screw for any combination of density, insertion depth, and insertion angle for the chosen range. The decision-tree model can be applied in patient-specific surgical planning and a decision-support system for spine-fusion surgery.

Testing Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Using Synthetic Bone Models: Is a Bilayer Foam Model a Better Representation of Vertebra?

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study. PURPOSE: A new biomechanical model of the vertebra has been developed that accounts for the inhomogeneity of bone and the contribution of the pedicle toward the holding strength of a pedicle screw. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Pullout strength studies are typically carried out on rigid polyurethane foams that represent the homogeneous vertebral framework of the spine. However, the contribution of the pedicle region, which contributes to the inhomogeneity in this framework, has not been considered in previous investigations. Therefore, we propose a new biomechanical model that can account for the vertebral inhomogeneity, especially the contribution of the pedicles toward the pullout strength of the pedicle screw. METHODS: A bilayer foam model was developed by joining two foams representing the pedicle and the vertebra. The results of the pullout strength tests performed on the foam models were compared with those from the tests performed on the cadaver lumbar vertebra. RESULTS: Significant differences (p <0.05) were observed between the pullout strength of the pedicle screw in extremely osteoporotic (0.18±0.11 kN), osteoporotic (0.37±0.14 kN), and normal (0.97±0.4 kN) cadaver vertebra. In the monolayer model, significant differences (p <0.05) were observed in pullout strength between extremely osteoporotic (0.3±0.02 kN), osteoporotic (0.65±0.12 kN), and normal (0.99±0.04 kN) bone model. However, the bilayer foam model exhibited no significant differences (p >0.05) in the pullout strength of pedicle screws between osteoporotic (0.85±0.08 kN) and extremely osteoporotic bone models (0.94±0.08 kN), but there was a significant difference (p <0.05) between osteoporotic (0.94±0.08 kN) and normal bone models (1.19±0.05 kN). There were no significant differences (p >0.05) in pullout strength between cadaver and bilayer foam model in normal bones. CONCLUSIONS: The new synthetic bone model that reflects the contribution of the pedicles to the pullout strength of the pedicle screws could provide a more efficacious means of testing pedicle-screw pullout strength. The bilayer model can match the pullout strength value of normal lumbar vertebra bone whereas the monolayer foam model was able to match that of the extremely osteoporotic lumbar vertebra.

Effect of various factors on pull out strength of pedicle screw in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models.

Pedicle screws are widely used for the treatment of spinal instability by spine fusion. Screw loosening is a major problem of spine fusion, contributing to delayed patient recovery. The present study aimed to understand the factor and interaction effects of density, insertion depth and insertion angle on pedicle screw pull out strength and insertion torque. A pull out study was carried out on rigid polyurethane foam blocks representing osteoporotic to normal bone densities according to the ASTM-1839 standard. It was found that density contributes most to pullout strength and insertion torque. The interaction effect is significant (p < 0.05) and contributes 8% to pull out strength. Axial pullout strength was 34% lower than angled pull out strength in the osteoporotic bone model. Insertion angle had no significant effect (p > 0.05) on insertion torque. Pullout strength and insertion torque had no significant correlation (p > 0.05) in the case of the extremely osteoporotic bone model.

Comparative Analysis of Effect of Density, Insertion Angle and Reinsertion on Pull-Out Strength of Single and Two Pedicle Screw Constructs Using Synthetic Bone Model.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of density, insertion angle and reinsertion on pull-out strength of pedicle screw in single and two screw-rod configurations. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Pedicle screw pull-out studies have involved single screw construct, whereas two screws and rod constructs are always used in spine fusions. Extrapolation of results using the single screw construct may lead to using expensive implants or increasing the fusion levels specifically in osteoporotic bones. METHODS: Single screw and two screw pull-out strength tests were carried out according to American Society for Testing and Materials F 543-07 on foam models to test the effect of density, insertion angle and reinsertion using poly axial pedicle screws. RESULTS: Bone density was the most significant factor deciding the pull-out strength in both single and two screw constructs. The difference in pull-out strength between single screw and two screw configurations in extremely osteoporotic bone model (80 kg/m(3)) was 78%, whereas in the normal bone model it was 48%. Axial pull-out value was highest for the single screw configuration; in the two screw configuration the highest pull-out strength was at 10°-15°. There was an 18% reduction in pull-out strength due to reinsertion in single screw configuration. The reinsertion effect was insignificant in the two screw configuration. CONCLUSIONS: A significant difference in response of various factors on holding power of pedicle screw between single and two-screw configurations is evident. The percentage increase in pull-out strength between single and two screw constructs is higher for osteoporotic bone when compared to normal bone. Reinsertion has no significant effect on pull-out strength in the two screw rod configuration.

Pull out strength calculator for pedicle screws using a surrogate ensemble approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used in the treatment of spinal disorders and deformities. Currently, the surgeon decides the holding power of instrumentation based on the perioperative feeling which is subjective in nature. The objective of the paper is to develop a surrogate model which will predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw based on density, insertion angle, insertion depth and reinsertion. METHODS: A Taguchi's orthogonal array was used to design an experiment to find the factors effecting pullout strength of pedicle screw. The pullout studies were carried using polyaxial pedicle screw on rigid polyurethane foam block according to American society for testing of materials (ASTM F543). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference multiple comparison tests were done to find factor effect. Based on the experimental results, surrogate models based on Krigging, polynomial response surface and radial basis function were developed for predicting the pullout strength for different combination of factors. An ensemble of these surrogates based on weighted average surrogate model was also evaluated for prediction. RESULTS: Density, insertion depth, insertion angle and reinsertion have a significant effect (p <0.05) on pullout strength of pedicle screw. Weighted average surrogate performed the best in predicting the pull out strength amongst the surrogate models considered in this study and acted as insurance against bad prediction. CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model for pullout strength of pedicle screw was developed using experimental values and surrogate models. This can be used in pre-surgical planning and decision support system for spine surgeon.